| REPORT CONFIRMS THAT 
			CONSUMERS ARE PAYING TOO MUCH FOR WATER AND THAT REGULATOR IS 
			ALLOWING PRIVATE EQUITY PROFITEERING "THE only way to stop this 
			rip off is re-nationalisation of this natural monopoly and this has 
			to be a top priority for the next Labour Party Election Manifesto"
			says GMB.   GMB, the union for water workers, 
			commented on a new report from Centre Forum which says that it is 
			time to end reckless profiteering in the water industry and get a 
			better deal for consumers.   Gary Smith GMB National 
			Secretary for Utilities said on 17 July 2013 that:- "This 
			report confirms what GMB has saying for years but our concerns have 
			been dismissed.
 The report finds that:-
 
 ► Since 2005 prices for water have been too high, more than required 
			to run a decent service for customers whilst providing a reasonable 
			return for investors.
 
 ► This has led to very high profits for water companies. These 
			profits, which are funded out of consumer bills, have not been spent 
			on improving customer service or for investing in infrastructure.
 
 ► Money has been transferred straight to shareholders who have seen 
			extraordinary returns on their investment.
 
 ► Ofwat got things wrong in price reviews after 1999 by 
			overestimating the cost of capital for water companies.
 
 ► The winners have been the shareholders who have used this extra 
			revenue to borrow billions and transfer it out of the company 
			through very large dividend payments. The losers are undoubtedly the 
			public who are paying for it.
 
 ► There are allegations of widespread tax avoidance.
 
 ► The level of corporate borrowing is 
			becoming unsustainable.
 
 ► The ownership structure means that there is very little public 
			accountability.
 
 ► Most of the largest water companies are owned by private equity 
			funds and there are no public meetings where management can be held 
			to account.
 
 ► The ownership structures are murky to say the least with strings 
			of companies dotted around the world's island secrecy jurisdictions 
			and tax havens.
 
 ► This ownership structure makes it difficult for the public to know 
			what is going on with its water suppliers.
 
 The claim that this rip off could not have been foreseen when this 
			natural monopoly industry was privatised in
			
			1989 is spurious.
 
 It was known then that the multimillionaire elite in private equity 
			target income streams from care homes, from pubs, water and other 
			sectors to cover interest payments on vast borrowings. This has led 
			to an £111 billion estimate that buyout companies in the UK will 
			have to refinance over the next 5 years. There will be more 
			insolvency.
 
 The coalition government will do nothing to correct this as the 
			people who organized this rip off in the water industry are their 
			friends and financial backers.
 
 The only way to stop this rip off is re-nationalisation of this 
			natural monopoly and this has to be a top priority for the next 
			Labour Party Election Manifesto."
 |  | High Speed Rail 
			Consultation commences 
			 THE formal consultation on 
			the High Speed Rail 2 project commenced on Wednesday, 17 July 2013. 
			The consultation will run until 31 January 2014, with Ministers 
			announcing the outcome at the end 2014.
 Merseytravel is leading and coordinating the consultation in the 
			Liverpool City Region and a combined response to that consultation 
			in relation to High Speed 2, Phase 2 will be provided.
 
 Under the High Speed Rail 2, Phase 2 scheme, journey times between 
			Liverpool (Merseyside) and London will improve significantly to 1 
			hour 36 minutes, over half an hour quicker than existing West Coast 
			Mainline services. The new line will also see capaCity on existing 
			Inter City Lines being freed up for greater freight and local 
			capaCity, bringing additional benefits to the region.
 
 City Region leaders have welcomed the current HS2 proposals, under 
			which trains to and from Liverpool will travel at maximum speed 
			between London and Crewe, before branching off to use the existing 
			Inter City Lines between Crewe and Liverpool Lime Street.
 
 However, the greatest potential and benefit for the Liverpool City 
			Region would truly be unlocked by the creation of a dedicated high 
			speed line into a new Liverpool City Centre Terminus. This would 
			free up capacity between Crewe and Liverpool, which under the 
			current proposal would still be taken up by the classic compatible 
			high speed trains and would also be a catalyst for major 
			regeneration opportunities around the station.
 
 Merseytravel and partners will therefore be continuing to make the 
			case strongly to the government that full high speed rail services 
			must come through to Liverpool.
 
 There are potentially very significant economic benefits for the 
			Liverpool City Region from the project.
 
 Official estimates put the overall economic benefits of the High 
			Speed Rail 2, Phase 2 project, that would bring full speed trains to 
			Crewe and then on to Liverpool at standard speeds, at £48.2billion 
			for Transport Benefits with the Wider Economic Benefits at 
			£63.6billion.
 
 It is estimated that in the region of 60,000 jobs could be created 
			by the Phase 2 project overall.
 
 Councillor Liam Robinson, Chair of Merseytravel, said:- "It is 
			vital that we do all we can to ensure that the Liverpool City Region 
			receives a proper share of the transport and economic benefits of 
			High Speed Rail 2. The scheme in its current form will bring us very 
			significant benefits for business, employment and for the travelling 
			public. Should we be successful in persuading government of the 
			benefits of bringing the full High Speed route in to Liverpool 
			itself, this would clearly be even better news for the City Region. 
			We expect that formal Information events will be held between 
			October and December this year and we will be working to ensure 
			engagement of the business community, public and voluntary sectors 
			and general public."
 |