weekly. Published online only.
enSouthport and Mersey Reporter
online newspaper. Your words.
Publication date:- 2017-14-04
user-generated Headlines and
reports on this page = 1 news items. Page - 9.
Formby Societies objection
to the development of Shorrocks Hill
THIS is a copy of a letter that the Formby Civic Society (FCS)
have submit in response to the proposed development at Shorrocks Hill, Formby.
"Formby Civic Society (FCS) would like to submit a response to the above
development, the details of which are contained in the council's recently
published proposed Modifications, Sustainability Appraisal and the Habitats
Regulations Assessment of the Local Plan.
We are not commentating on the whole document; our concerns are centred on the
Formby area and the site at Shorrocks Hill.
The site has many attributes which are important to our wildlife and to the
local character of the area; it also helps to preserve part of Formby's past.
Shorrocks Hill was once the family home of the Formby family who played an
essential part in shaping the character and the natural environment of Formby.
Part of the house still remains although it has changed considerably over the
years. The Formby family were responsible for the planting of acres of woodland
and avenues of trees which now provide numerous habitats for our most endangered
species. The structure of the house still stands in grounds which are covered
with a variety of mature trees; there is also an area of woodland to the west of
the house known as Local Wildlife No 19 which has abundant undergrowth providing
a wealth of supporting habitats. The owners say they have aerial photographs
which show very little evidence of species habitation. Local people however
disagree with this. Paint balling has probably caused disturbance to woodland
species and been responsible for the loss of some wildlife on the site. Despite
this the local community have seen numbers of red squirrels and hedgehogs in
adjacent gardens and trees. Sites that support endangered species are considered
a reason alone for avoiding further disturbance to their future survival.
MN214A lies in an area of Formby that is attractive and pleasant to locals and
visitors alike. The benefits of areas like this are beyond question and
irreplaceable. Their value to the survival of many species and to nature cannot
be underestimated. It is within Sefton's green belt and satisfies 4 of the 5
purposes of the green belt.
It is surrounded by Sefton's unique coastal and dune system, which is regarded
as an area of international importance. Many protections and designations have
been established over the years under EU Special Protection and Birds Directive.
The MN214A site is within 190m of 2 of these special designations, a SAC
(Special Area of Conservation) and a Ramsar site. The area is Sefton council's
responsibility and comes under their management. They are duty bound to enhance
and protect the biodiversity of those sites that come under their control. To
consider development of site MN214A would not be in accord with these
To our knowledge the council have refused previous requests for planning
permission on the grounds that the site was too valuable in terms of nature
conservation. We believe that this was a responsible decision by the council.
The council's recently published Habitats Regulation Assessment includes
explicit protection for this site. Concern is expressed towards the effect of a
development on this site as being likely to result in an increase of 1% in
Nitrogen inputs into the nearby SAC. Extra noise and light pollution from houses
and cars it says would also cause considerable disturbance and loss of valuable
species. Mention is also made of extra visitor pressure which is already a
concern to those who manage the coastal areas, a situation which will obviously
be exacerbated by the building of another 1,000 new homes in Formby which could
mean an extra 2 to 3 thousand people in the area.
People love to visit the Formby coast and need the benefits it
provides but a fine balance has to be kept so that it survives for future
generations to enjoy, keeping this balance is an ever increasing challenge. By
allowing any part of this unique coastline to be built on will weaken the safe
guards that have protected it so well, leaving it vulnerable to other proposals
for permission to develop within its boundaries. Site MN214A will mean an
encroachment onto a part of the Sefton coast and an area that has value in terms
of nature conservation; the consequences are very worrying and..." >>>Continued>>>
possible relaxation of the regulations put
in place to protect it.
On studying the HRA we would like to refer to a number of polices which we feel
are relevant to our objections.
POLICY EQ2 Sets down the importance of new developments respecting its settings
and the need to retain or enhance key views in the landscape, also that any
development on the urban fringe should have a smooth transition into the
countryside. FCS are concerned that the site proposals for 60 houses, a car park
and toilet block will neither enhance the lovely wooded surroundings nor blend
in with it. There will be a stark contrast between a wildlife site and rows of
houses and cars.
POLICY EQ9 Says, loss or damage of existing trees or woodland on development
sites should be avoided, trees that are lost should be replanted, and veteran
trees are even more of a loss to wildlife and are irreplaceable. FCS believe
that many trees will be lost in order to build the car park Trees on this site
are around a hundred years old and are therefore of more importance. The absence
of trees on this sight will have a detrimental effect on the whole landscape of
POLICY MH1 Says Sefton's natural assets together with its landscape character
should continue to contribute to the boroughs sense of place, local
distinctiveness and quality of life, a hierarchal approach will be taken to the
protection and enhancement of Sefton's natural assets, including ecological
networks and green infrastructure. FCS say the proposals for this site do not
conform in any way with the wording of this policy and that this well-known area
of Formby will be changed beyond all recognition to residents and visitors
alike. Its contribution as one of Sefton's natural assets will be nullified.
POLICY MH2 Says, developments that may cause significant harm will only be
permitted in Local sites of conservation where the reason for and the benefits
of development clearly outweigh the impact on the nature conservation of the
site. FCS says, the proximity of this site to the local wildlife site will cause
an impact on the habitats and continuing existence of endangered species who are
resident there. Noise, light pollution and human activity close by could easily
disturb the viability of the site. We are unsure that the benefits of a
development on this scale will outweigh the impacts it will have.
FCS are aware that proposal MN2 14A in the Modifications Documents is at an
early stage. We have seen that an HRA has to be carried out on this site. A
thorough HRA investigation of the sites value to nature should then be able to
be established. But FCS would like to point out that the council are saying they
will carry out an HRA to enable this site to be "screened out "which will then
mean that it will "not require further consideration", does this mean that its
value has already been determined? If so it is of great concern. This site needs
an independent appraisal and a thorough investigation; can we be assured of
this? Will the statement in the HRA which says that proposals for site MN214A
may result in a likely significant effect on a internally important site be
In conclusion FCS does not feel that permitting a large scale development on
this site is appropriate. The development will be outside the present
residential boundary line of Formby defined by St.Lukes Road which runs in a
straight line down its western edge. The march of urbanisation does not go
beyond this boundary.
It is questionable if the site should all be designated as brown field; nearly
60% of it is undeveloped. The riding stables are very welcome and provide a much
needed amenity due to the loss of many such facilities in Formby. The demolition
of Shorrocks Hill is most regrettable, it was once an exclusive leisure complex
and could have many worthwhile uses both privately or community based. FCS are
aware that this site will be the subject of further consideration if it is
included in the Local Plan but would urge the council to study the reasons in
the replies they receive for the retention of this much loved area of Formby and
why it deserves protection for its value towards the natural environment."
Mrs Y. Irving Amenities Secretary, Formby Civic Society.
Sign up to our
Daily Email News Service by clicking
Did you know we where the UK's 1st online only
newspaper and we still are? Here at Southport
and Mersey Reporter we are still at
leading the way for local news.
email addresses and information is held under the
UK's Data Protection Act.
Deceased estates notice - Lilian May
Pursuant to the Trustee Act 1925, any persons
having a claim against or an interest in the Estate of Lilian
May Jackam (also known as Lillian May) Jackam (Deceased), late
of Birch Abbey Rest Home, 55 Alexandra Road, Southport,
Merseyside, PR9 9HD, UK, who died on 04/10/2018, are required to
send particulars thereof in writing, to the undersigned
Solicitors, on or before 24/05/2019, after which date the Estate
will be distributed having regard only to claims and interests
of which they have had notice. Churches Solicitors, 12 High
Street, Fareham, Hampshire, PO16 7BL, UK. Ref:-
Contact us:- (+44)08443 244
will cost 7p per minute, plus your telephone
company's access charge.
this number may be recorded for security, broadcast,
training and record keeping.