Merseyrail profits would pay
for keeping guards almost 3 times over
Photo by RMT Union.
MERSEYRAIL and Merseytravel claims that
they cannot afford to keep guards have been exposed as entirely wrong and
misleading by new research showing that dividends paid out by Merseryrail are up
to ₤14million a year, almost 3 times the cost of keeping guards.
The research also shows that in 2014 the revenue income of Merseyrail was ₤51
million, and Merseyrail paid out a dividend not far short of ₤14 million meaning
a quarter of passenger fares ending up in the pockets of Merseyrails owners,
Serco and Dutch state owned Abellio. RMT believes that instead of getting rid of Guards Merseyrail should forsake
some of its dividends to pay keep the guards and if it does not do so
voluntarily then Merseytravel should renegotiate its contract with Merseyrail.
If Merseyrail won't cooperate then, when their contract expires in 2028, any new
contract should ensure that revenues are retained to keep the guards; this is
easily achievable as the new trains are to be brought through a 30 year long
Mick Cash RMT General Secretary said:- "These figures show that up to a
quarter of fare revenue is being sucked out of Merseyrail to pay for dividends
of around ₤14m a year.
That is frankly obscene under any circumstances but the fact that around ₤14m a
year is being allowed to leak out of Meresyrail while at the same time senior
Liverpool politicians are pleading poverty as an excuse to get rid of guards
will be utterly unacceptable for passengers and Council Tax Payers. And as
Merseyrail is part owned by the Dutch state railway it is a case of Merseyside 0
Holland ₤14m. Merseyrail can easily afford to cough up and pay to keep our
guards and if they don't then Liverpool's politicians should renegotiate
Merseyrail's contract. If Merseyrail don't agree to new terms now, then
the 30 year financing of the new trains easily allows enough scope for a new
Merseyrail contract to ensure that revenues are retained to keep our guards. At
the very least as we approach the elections in May Liverpool politicians should
be calling for a review of the financing options."