| IMPRESS want to redefine 
	journalism - Part 2Photos and report by Madeleine 
	Saghir
 To read first part of this report, please 
click on 
here now. ...Continued... 
	IMPRESS are not funded by the public. Trusts such as the Andrew Wainwright 
	Reform Trust support them. J.K Rowling and Max Mosley also support IMPRESS. Merricks has said that:- "(We) cannot allow ourselves to be in a position to 
	be moved if we offend the funder." Therefore, the trustees are 
	professionals. In 3 to 4 years, IMPRESS is expected to be 'self sustaining,'
	which will allow small publishers to join at a modest cost.
 "Only a year after being set up, the 'Hacked Off' pressure group had 
	reported in the national media that people still clearly lacked confidence 
	in the newly formed regulator called IPSO (Independent Press Standards 
	Organisation), which was set up at the end of the Leveson Inquiry, by the old 
	PCC (Press Complaints Commission). The old PCC had been slammed in the 
	findings of Lord Justice Leveson, and it closed in September 2014, and was 
	replaced by IPSO. So why would IMPRESS want to be formed, when IPSO is now 
	up and running…? Well, many within the industry have said that the findings 
	at the end of the inquiry had been "white washed over" by IPSO. Also, that 
	the new 'regulator' is just a rebranded PCC and that is why people have no 
	confidence in it. IPSO, which has the backing of the vast majority of the 
	UK's major newspaper and magazine publishers, has said it will not seek 
	recognition under a Royal Charter, but IMPRESS will!" said Patrick Trollope, 
	our Editor.
 So why some of the media would be worried about IMPRESS getting a Royal 
	Charter? If the Royal Charter, if granted, it would also give IMPRESS huge 
	pulling power, making them the more dominant of the 2 regulators. It could 
	also mean its members are protected from paying claimants' legal costs under 
	a clause in the Crime and Courts Act, should that act be introduced, a 
	criteria set out in Lord Justice Leveson's 2012 report. If introduced, it 
	would heavily help small publishers, thus making more of the media follow 
	the regulator and the rules it enforces. It is hoped that this act will lead 
	to far more robust journalism, for the public good, but also penalise those 
	who do not follow the regulators rules; a kind of reward for good behaviour 
	approach. But parts of the media are feeling that it could mean UK 
	Government interference, which would be of major concern. On the positive 
	side, it would mean the vast amount of un-represented publishers would be 
	encouraged to come to the table, which, up to now, have had no incentive to 
	join a regulator. IMPRESS so far, is appealing to many small publishers due 
	to its far lower joining costs. Currently, we are 1 of the 12 new members 
	who have fully signed up, with over 30 others soon to follow. Most titles to 
	sign up to IMPRESS are local titles, like Port Talbot Magnet (Wales), the 
	Caerphilly Observer (Wales) and The Lincolnite (Lincolnshire). A list of 
	some of the new sign ups is at the end of this report. "It's interesting to 
	note that IPSO is mostly backed by the Murdoch titles and others major 
	newspaper and magazine publishers, but has very few small independent 
	publications represented." commented our Editor.
 The other benefit of membership of IMPRESS will be to give publishers ways 
	to demonstrate the difference between fake news sites and real news sites. 
	This growth in fake news, especially online, is a growing problem that is 
	impacting on both standards and finances of those who are trying to follow 
	the rules, thus another incentive for those who have yet to join IMPRESS. 
	Plus, as we stated earlier in this report, publishers who are not signed up 
	could face "exemplary" damages, in libel cases, that could see many fake 
	news websites being shut down.
 
 IMPRESS has also pointed out that few national titles, both magazine and 
	newspapers, are now sitting on the fence, waiting to see what happens next, 
	before joining either of them.
 
 So we now ask, can this newcomer to UK's world of press regulation, IMPRESS, 
	impress the media and the public, unlike IPSO who have appear to have done 
	the opposite?
 
 IMPRESS is not yet fully officially recognised, but will open in spring 
	2016. To find out more information about them, please visit them 
	online.
 
 We would like to hear from you, our readers, about us joining IMPRESS. 
	Please email your views on this topic, and about us joining to our news room 
	at:- News24@SouthportReporter.Com  and let us know what you think. Also, if 
	you are one of the many publishers who have been sitting on the fence and 
	you want to join IMPRESS, please contact them for more information. We are 
	also willing to talk you through the sign up and help you work on meeting 
	the standards required.
 
 Just to make it clear.
 IMPRESS is about standards of news reporting, in the sense of accuracy of 
	the information being given out to the public and how we act in order to 
	obtain it. IMPRESS is not here to take complaints about grammar, spelling 
	and format. They are also not going to take on publishers on over paying 
	staff, unless it is part of an issue involving the reporting of a subject, 
	such as paying for witness information. This, in our view is extremely 
	important and we feel that all local online or offline newspapers and 
	magazines, hyper-news websites, local and other news reporting sites, which 
	fall under the criteria of the Crime and Courts Act, should adhere to these 
	ethical standards in their daily practice.
 Please see the following links for more background on this topic:-
 
 
		
			| 
		
			| Link | Site | What it is... |  
			| LINK | IPSO | An independent 
			regulator for the newspaper and magazine industry in the UK. |  
			| LINK | IMPRESS | An independent 
			regulator for the newspaper and magazine industry in the UK. |  
			| LINK | Leveson Report | The official 
			site of the Leveson Inquiry. |  
			| LINK | LSE | University in 
			London.  Link to its press release about the event. |  
			| LINK | Hacked Off | A UK campaign 
			group. It was established in 2011, Hacked Off campaigns for a free 
			and accountable press. |  
			| LINK | NUJ | The NUJ's code 
			of conduct has set out the main principles of UK and Irish 
			journalism since 1936. |  
			| LINK | Wikipedia | A free online 
			information site. – Ok, not the best site for 100% facts, but it has 
			the basic information on it, about the old PCC. |  
			| LINK | BBC | A news report 
			on the BBC Radio 4 website about IMPRESS. |  |  More links can be found on our Facebook 
	
	
	Page, plus please do email us your thoughts or send them over on our 
	Facebook Page. |